State and Local Taxation

Subscribe to State and Local Taxation RSS Feed

Mike Cullers on New Hampshire v. Massachusetts

In a complaint filed directly with the U.S. Supreme Court under its original jurisdiction,[1] New Hampshire has sued Massachusetts for attempting to tax residents of the Granite State who normally work in Massachusetts but are working at home during the pandemic. Read Mike’s comments on the case in The Bond Buyer here ($).… Continue Reading

Nuggets of Midterm Gold from our Public Policy Practice

The midterm elections are (mostly!) over. What’s coming next? No one is in a better position to tell you the answer than our Public Policy colleagues. Here for your reading and savoring are two pieces – a breakdown that spans all areas of law, and an analysis of what the election means specifically for tax … Continue Reading

It’s Unanimous – All Nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices Agree that Quill Corp. v. North Dakota was Wrongly Decided, and Five Vote to Overrule It in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.

Yes, you read that correctly.  On June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. [1]  (We’ve discussed the background to Wayfair here, here, here, and here.)  The Court, by a 5 – 4 majority, held that a vendor need not have a physical presence in a state … Continue Reading

Oyez! The Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Wayfair, and Now We Play the Waiting Game

On April 17, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.  Wayfair is a direct challenge of the Court’s holding in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), that, under the dormant Commerce Clause, a remote/online vendor does not have to collect and remit … Continue Reading

Tax Policy by Tweet

One of the many recent targets of Twitter criticism from President Trump has been the internet retailer Amazon.  Presumably after being informed by his staff that jobs in the retail industry constitute a much more significant share of national employment than those in coal mining (or after hearing about it on CNN), Mr. Trump posted … Continue Reading

The Allen Iverson Trilogy – A Postscript

We’ve previously posted about the City of Cleveland income tax refund claims brought by two former National Football League players, the grant of those refund claims by the Ohio Supreme Court, and the denial of Cleveland’s petition for certiorari by the United States Supreme Court.  As detailed in these prior posts, the Cleveland income tax … Continue Reading

Ohio Supreme Court Finds that Allen Iverson is not “The Answer”

During his NBA playing career, former Philadelphia 76ers point guard Allen Iverson was known as The Answer.  He famously minimized the importance of practice compared to official games, making it clear that he was compensated for playing in games, not for practicing.  For income tax purposes, the City of Cleveland agrees with Mr. Iverson, taxing nonresident … Continue Reading

Supreme Court to City: Drop Dead

On October 30, 1975, The Daily News published one of the most famous headlines in American history – Ford to City: Drop Dead – to paraphrase President Ford’s refusal to extend federal financial assistance to New York City to prevent the City from declaring bankruptcy.  Nearly 40 years later, a different branch of the federal … Continue Reading

For Your Holiday Shopping Pleasure – The Death of the Marketplace Fairness Act (at Least in this Congress)

As reported by the National Journal, on December 3, 2014, Speaker of the House John Boehner made it clear in a closed-door meeting that the House of Representatives would not vote on the Marketplace Fairness Act of 2013 (pdf) before the current session of Congress adjourns (the current session of Congress is expected to adjourn … Continue Reading

Allen Iverson – Still The Answer?

During his NBA playing career, former Philadelphia 76ers point guard Allen Iverson was known as The Answer.  He famously minimized the importance of practice compared to official games, making it clear that he was compensated for playing in games, not for practicing.  For income tax purposes, the City of Cleveland agrees with Mr. Iverson, taxing … Continue Reading
LexBlog